Bulletin
Volume 4, Issue 3, Winter 1998
Neuroendocrine
& Pituitary Center
| Referrals
| Neuroendocrine
Bulletin Archive
Guestbook | Neurosurgery
Home | Links
Articles in this issue:
Prolactinomas
and Pregnancy
Anne Klibanski, M.D.
Prolactin, a pro-lactational hormone,
is secreted by the pituitary gland in a pulsatile fashion and
is kept within the normal range predominantly under the influence
of dopaminergic inhibition throughout adult life. During pregnancy,
prolactin secretion in normal women markedly increases from
the beginning of pregnancy until delivery. The marked rise in
serum prolactin concentrations, often into a range of 100 to
200 ng/ml or higher is the result of an actual increase in lactotroph
number and capacity because of stimulation by estradiol. Estrogen
both stimulates lactotroph number and prolactin secretion by
a direct effect on prolactin transcription and also cell proliferation,
and, by an effect of estrogen to decrease central dopaminergic
tone. Hyperprolactinemia from a number of pathologic conditions
including a pituitary tumor, primary hypothyroidism, renal failure
and secondary to a number of medications including psychotropic
medications, antidepressants and a number of antihypertensives,
can elevate serum prolactin levels and interfere with normal
ovulatory function and fertility. Pathologic hyperprolactinemia
has long been known to be associated with amenorrhea, anovulation
and infertility. Of importance also, is the syndrome of intermittent
or transient hyperprolactinemia found in a number of women with
regular menstrual periods but luteal phase insufficiency. In
a paper by Huang et al1 serum prolactin levels measured in 151
patients with luteal phase deficiency showed that 21.9% of patients
had mild hyperprolactinemia most commonly seen around the time
of ovulation. In such patients, successful pregnancy can typically
be achieved with the initiation of dopamine agonist therapy
if this is found to be the only underlying abnormality. Therefore,
there exists a large spectrum of abnormalities associated with
hyperprolactinemia that can interfere with normal ovulatory
function and conception in women.
Although prolactin secretion
in patients with prolactin secreting adenomas, both microadenomas
(<10 mm) and macroadenomas (>10 mm) is typically autonomous
and poorly responsive to normal physiologic stimulants to
prolactin release, patients with underlying prolactin secreting
tumors are at risk for the development of tumor enlargement
causing symptoms during pregnancy. Pituitary tumors themselves
may enlarge under the influence of high endogenous levels
of gonadal steroids, specifically estradiol. In addition,
there is marked hyperplasia of normal lactotrophs. Enlargement
of a prolactinoma during pregnancy may be associated with
symptoms due to tumor mass such as headaches, and specifically
neuroophthamalogic abnormalities including visual field loss.
The likelihood of symptomatic enlargement during pregnancy
is directly related to the size of the underlying lesion,
and in part, the extent and anatomic configuration of the
tumor itself. A number of studies have investigated the outcome
of patients with pregnancy and prolactinomas2. In patients
with microprolactinomas, the risk has been reported to be
between 2 to 5%. In the MGH experience of over 100 pregnancies
in patients with microprolactinomas, progressive symptomatic
enlargement causing neurologic deficits or visual field loss
is extremely rare. However, in patients with macroprolactinomas,
the likelihood of symptomatic tumor enlargement is much higher
and can affect up to a quarter or more of patients. Patients
who have pituitary macroadenomas with significant suprasellar
extension may be at higher risk for the development of visual
field abnormalities during pregnancy than patients with pituitary
tumors which extend laterally or inferiorly into the cavernous
sinus. Overall, innumerable studies indicate that the majority
of patients with prolactinomas, regardless of size, can be
safely managed during pregnancy without dopamine agonist therapy.
How should patients with known
prolactinomas be monitored throughout pregnancy? Because the
majority of patients with prolactinomas do not develop symptomatic
enlargement, it is our policy to discontinue dopamine agonist
therapy when the pregnancy test becomes positive. This approach
is followed uniformly in almost all patients. If a patient
is beginning a pregnancy with a known lesion with previous
significant chiasmal compression and visual field loss, and
now has a lesion not compressing but nearly abutting the optic
chiasm, the decision as to whether to continue dopamine agonist
therapy during pregnancy must be made on an individual basis.
In the vast majority of cases, however, patients do not continue
to receive dopamine agonist therapy during pregnancy. Although
there are no data to suggest that dopamine agonists, such
as Parlodel, are teratogenic, these medications are not approved
for use during pregnancy. Should prolactin levels be monitored
during pregnancy in a patient with an underlying prolactinoma?
We do not routinely monitor prolactin levels during pregnancy
for the following two reasons. First, prolactin levels in
a normal pregnancy can increase to levels in the hundreds
range or higher and may be indistinguishable from prolactin
levels during pregnancy in a patient with a prolactinoma.
Second, a patient would not be treated during pregnancy if
the prolactin elevation were not associated with clear-cut
clinical symptoms such as neurologic or neuroophthamalogic
signs. Therefore, the best way to monitor patients during
pregnancy with an underlying prolactinoma is to make the patient
aware of symptoms that may be suggestive of mass effect such
as headache, visual abnormalities or systemic signs consistent
with pituitary insufficiency. We monitor patients routinely
throughout pregnancy. In patients with macroprolactinomas,
visual fields should be done during pregnancy on a monthly
basis. In patients with microadenomas, the frequency of follow-up
is somewhat individual dependent upon the patient. Given the
low prevalence of tumor enlargement in patients with microadenomas,
formal visual fields testing once each trimester is probably
sufficient but should certainly be done sooner should the
patient develop any symptoms consistent with mass effect.
Postpartum patients with idiopathic
hyperprolactinemia or microprolactinomas can certainly be
allowed to nurse. Prolactin should be rechecked at three to
six months following pregnancy and if prolactin continues
to be elevated and is associated with menstrual abnormalities
and other symptoms, dopamine agonist therapy should be reinstituted
unless the patient wants to continue nursing. In patients
with macroadenomas, resumption of dopamine agonist therapy
postpartum should be individually made depending upon the
patient's symptoms and need for medical control of the underlying
tumor.
The recent introduction of Dostinex
(cabergoline), a long-acting D2 specific dopamine agonist,
has changed the routine management of prolactinomas. Because
of the improved efficacy and lower incidence of side effects
with this medication, patients are often started on cabergoline
as an initial mode of therapy given on a once-a-week or twice-a-week
basis. In patients who are specifically seeking pregnancy,
the decision as to what dopamine agonist to use becomes more
problematic. Parlodel has been in clinical use for over twenty
years and there is extensive experience in inducing ovulation
in patients with Parlodel. Although cabergoline has been in
use for several years in Europe, the experience in inducing
pregnancy in terms of safety is still relatively new. In a
series published in 1997 by Ciccarelli et al, 47 women were
treated with cabergoline for 1 to 82 months. There were nine
patients reported who became pregnant. In two patients, one
patient with a microadenoma and one patient with idiopathic
hyperprolactinemia, prolactin levels remained in the normal
range for one to three years after delivery. This series is
too small to determine whether the spontaneous resolution
which is sometimes reported after pregnancy in patients with
underlying hyperprolactinemia is at all associated with the
use of cabergoline. The experience to assess the possibility
of teratogenicity of cabergoline is limited to a 1996 report
by Musatti et al published in the European literature.4 This
series reports 226 pregnancies in 205 women with follow-up
data available in 204 women and there was no increase in the
miscarriage rate, distribution of birth weights, or rate of
congenital malformations reported among the babies of mothers
who became pregnant while receiving cabergoline. Although
these data are reassuring, the long-term safety of this medication
in inducing pregnancy is in no way comparable to the data
available in patients who have become pregnant on Parlodel.
Therefore, our recommendation is to use Parlodel in patients
who are actively trying to achieve a pregnancy. If a patient
is receiving Dostinex for therapy of hyperprolactinemia and
becomes pregnant, these preliminary data are reassuring and
it will be anticipated that a large number of other such pregnancies
will be reported in the next few years.
The spectrum of reproductive
abnormalities associated with hyperprolactinemia ranges from
frank amenorrhea and galactorrhea to very subtle luteal phase
deficiencies manifested only by periovulatory hyperprolactinemia.
Reproductive abnormalities associated with hyperprolactinemia
in women typically respond very well to dopamine agonist therapy.
Pregnancies can be achieved in patients with underlying normal
gonadotroph function by inhibiting prolactin with a dopamine
agonist. There is no evidence that radiation therapy will
prevent tumor enlargement during pregnancy in a patient with
an underlying prolactinoma and the radiation therapy itself
may be deleterious to gonadotroph function in patients who
still have gonadotroph capacity. Transsphenoidal surgery can
be used in patients to control hyperprolactinemia and tumor
size in patients who are unresponsive or poorly responsive
to dopamine agonist therapy. Symptomatic tumor enlargement
during pregnancy rarely occurs and is best managed with the
re-institution of Parlodel therapy. Finally, transsphenoidal
surgery can be considered in those patients who have symptoms
during pregnancy that are refractory to dopamine agonist administration
or who have rapidly developing neurologic symptoms.
References
1. Huang KE, Bonfiglio TA, Muechler EK. Transient hyperprolactinemia
in infertile women with luteal phase deficiency. Obstet Gynecol.
1991; 78 (4): 651-655.
2. Molitch ME. Management of prolactinomas. Ann Rev Med. 1989;
40: 225-232.
3. Ciccarelli E, Grottoli S, Razzore P, et al. Long-term treatment
with cabergoline, a new long-lasting ergoline derivate, in
idiopathic or tumorous hyperprolactinaemia and outcome of
drug-induced pregnancy. J Endocrinol Invest. 1997; 20(9):
547-551.
4. Robert E, Musatti L, Piscitelli G, Ferrari CI. Pregnancy
outcome after treatment with the ergot derivative, cabergoline.
Reprod Toxicol. 1996; 10(4): 333-337.
Central
Hypothyroidism due to Pituitary/Hypothalamic Dysfunction
Karen K. Miller, M.D.
Central hypothyroidism is an important
complication of pituitary disease and, because TSH levels are
not useful, the diagnosis and therapeutic considerations are
difficult.
Central hypothyroidism is defined
as a reduction in circulating thyroid hormone as a result
of inadequate stimulation of a normal thyroid gland by TSH
and may be secondary, due to pituitary disease, or tertiary,
due to hypothalamic dysfunction. Causes include all pathologic
processes that affect the hypothalamus or pituitary including
tumors, Sheehan's syndrome, idiopathic hypopituitarism and
infiltrative diseases, such as sarcoidosis, histiocytosis
and lymphocytic hypophysitis. Radiation-induced central hypothyroidism
is common in patients irradiated for pituitary tumors. Tsang
et al. retrospectively examined records of 160 patients who
had received radiation for non-functioning pituitary adenomas
8 to 22 years before and found that 65% required thyroid replacement
therapy, with 23% of patients' hypothyroidism directly attributable
to the radiation therapy received [1]. In addition, hypothyroidism
is common in patients receiving radiation for nasopharyngeal
or paranasal sinus tumors and brain tumors. Constine et al.
evaluated the endocrine function of 32 patients who had received
radiation for brain tumors, including gliomas, medulloblastomas
and ependymomas, from 2 to 13 years before, and found that
65% had low free T4 levels. The probability of hypothyroidism
depended on the amount of radiation received, with doses of
more than 5000 rads (50 Gy) to the pituitary and hypothalamus
necessary for the development of hypothyroidism. Moreover,
the longer the interval since irradiation, the more likely
a patient was to have developed hypothyroidism [2]. Therefore,
the percentage of patients developing hypothyroidism may have
been even higher had the follow-up been longer. In addition,
because the onset of hypothyroidism may occur years after
the administration of the radiation, constant vigilance for
the signs and symptoms of hypothyroidism in this population
is imperative and yearly monitoring of thyroid hormone levels
obligatory.
As in primary hypothyroidism,
the symptoms of central hypothyroidism include fatigue, apathy,
weight gain, dry skin, constipation and cold intolerance.
Signs include periorbital edema, cool extremities, delayed
relaxation of the deep tendon reflexes and bradycardia. The
signs and symptoms of central hypothyroidism mimic those of
several other common conditions, and this disorder is therefore
difficult to diagnose. A low free T4 or free T4 index and
a low TSH in the setting of pituitary disease and signs and
symptoms of hypothyroidism point in a straightforward manner
to the diagnosis of central hypothyroidism. Unfortunately,
however, the TSH is most commonly in the normal range in cases
of central hypothyroidism, creating a confusing picture. Research
has shown that, in some of these cases, a bio-inactive TSH
resulting from abnormal glycosylation of the TSH molecule
[3-6] explains the higher than expected TSH levels. Therefore,
although the serum TSH is measured as normal in routine assays,
performed by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) or immunochemiluminometric
assay (ICMA), only a small proportion of the TSH molecules
function normally. Although these "normal" TSH values
can confound the diagnosis of central hypothyroidism, it should
be noted that a "normal" or slightly high TSH is
inappropriate when circulating thyroid hormone levels are
low, and that in cases of primary hypothyroidism, the TSH
would be expected to be much higher. Therefore, TSH is not
a useful screen for the diagnosis of this disorder.
The management of central hypothyroidism
is further complicated by the fact that the TSH cannot be
used to monitor therapeutic response to L-thyroxine therapy.
When pituitary pathology is not present, the TSH provides
an accurate method of assessing the appropriateness of circulating
thyroid hormone levels for each particular patient. However,
pituitary or hypothalamic pathology often interrupts the feedback
mechanism by preventing normal release of TSH and/or TRH.
The consequences of this are two-fold. First, patients with
pituitary pathology or who have been irradiated cannot be
screened for hypothyroidism with TSH levels alone, as a normal
TSH often belies central hypothyroidism. Moreover, the usually
routine monitoring of thyroid replacement becomes more problematic.
Inadequate replacement doses of l-thyroxine often result in
markedly subnormal TSH values. Therefore, TSH values are not
reliable as an accurate reflection of thyroid status, and
a free T4 or free T4 index must be used to adjust the replacement
dose. However, as in primary hypothyroidism, when appropriately
diagnosed and treated, management of central hypothyoidism
can result in prompt resolution of symptoms.
References
1. Tsang R, Brierley J, Panzarella
T, et al., 1994 Radiation therapy for pituitary adenoma: treatment
outcome and prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
30:557-565.
2. Constine L, Woolf P, Cann D, et al. 1993 Hypothalamic-pituitary
dysfunction after radiation for brain tumors. N Engl J Med.
328:87-94.
3. Papandreou M, Persani L, Asteria C, Ronin C, and Beck-Peccoz
P. 1993 Variable carbohydrate structures of circulating thyrotropin
as studied by lectin affinity chromatography in different
clinical conditions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:393.
4. Miura Y, Perkel V, Papenberg K, Johnson M, and Magner J.
1989 Concanavalin-A, lentil, and ricin lectin affinity binding
characteristic of human thyrotropin: differences in the sialylation
of thyrotropin in sera of euthyroid, primary and central hypothyroid
patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 69:985-995.
5. Taylor T and Weintraub B. 1989 Altered thyrotropin (TSH)
carbohydrate structures in hypothalamic hypothyroidism created
by paraventricular nuclear lesions are corrected by in vivo
TSH-releasing hormone administration. Endocrinology. 125:2189-2203.
6. Magner J, Klibanski A, Fein H, et al. 1992 Ricin and lentil
lectin affinity chromatography reveals oligosaccharide heterogeneity
of thyrotropin secreted by 12 human pituitary tumors. Metabolism.
41:1009-1015.
Androgen
Deficiency and It's Therapy in HIV-Infected Men
Steve Grinspoon, M.D..
Among men with HIV disease, gonadal
dysfunction is highly prevalent. In early studies, over half
of all men with AIDS demonstrated low testosterone levels. The
prevalence of hypogonadism increases with severity of illness,
and is most often associated with normal gonadotropin levels
in 75% of cases. Potential mechanisms of secondary hypogonadism
in HIV-infected men include undernutrition and chronic illness
which may reduce GnRH pulsatility, inducing a state of hypogonadotropic
hypogonadism. In addition, medications are a potential cause
of secondary hypogonadism in this population. Megestrol acetate,
a synthetic progestational agent, may result in profound hypogonadism
in treated patients. More rarely, mass lesions of the pituitary
and hypothalamus are seen and may represent opportunistic infections,
such as toxoplasmosis or HIV-related malignancies, including
lymphoma. Primary hypogonadism is often idiopathic, but may
also be related to opportunistic infection or malignancy. More
recent data suggest a lower prevalence of 25% for hypogonadism
among HIV-infected men with advanced HIV disease. However, hypogonadism
remains prevalent among HIV-infected men, even in the era of
highly active antiviral therapy or HAART.
The diagnosis of hypogonadism
is best made by determination of the serum free or bioavailable
testosterone levels, because of increased SHBG levels in HIV
disease. Measurement of gonadotropin levels is useful to differentiate
primary from secondary hypogonadism, and in secondary hypogonadism,
gonadotropins will be inappropriately low or normal in the
setting of low testosterone levels. Imaging of the hypothalamus
and pituitary glands is recommended in the setting of headache,
visual changes or in association with other signs and symptoms
of pituitary disease.
The sequelae of hypogonadism
among HIV-infected patients include decreased muscle mass
and functional capacity, fatigue and reduced quality of life.
Decreased lean body mass is a significant predictor of increased
mortality and reduced survival among HIV-infected patients
and is therefore an important clinical endpoint in this population.
Among men with AIDS wasting, testosterone levels are highly
correlated with lean body mass. Furthermore, such patients
demonstrate a disproportionate loss of muscle mass, in comparison
to weight. Importantly, significant loss of muscle mass or
sarcopenia is seen even among stable, protease inhibitor-treated
patients, in whom there is a direct correlation between muscle
mass and functional status.
The effects of testosterone
administration in hypogonadal HIV-infected men were recently
investigated. In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, testosterone
was administered at 300 mg intramuscularly every 3 weeks for
6 months. Muscle and lean body mass increased significantly
in the testosterone-treated relative to the placebo-treated
patients by approximately 3 kg (Figure 1). Importantly, patients
reported a subjective benefit with respect to improved overall
quality of life, appearance and well being. The testosterone
was well tolerated and without adverse effects. The relative
change in lean body mass in response to testosterone is equivalent
to or greater than that of other anabolic agents used in the
AIDS wasting syndrome, including growth hormone. The use of
physiologic testosterone administration (200-300 mg IM q 2-3
weeks) for hypogonadal HIV-infected men is now routine, and
all such patients, particularly men with the wasting syndrome,
should be screened and treated for hypogonadism when appropriate.
Transdermal delivery of testosterone
is now an alternative to intramuscular dosing for HIV-infected
patients. Two such transdermal products, Androderm (r) and
Testoderm (r) are now commercially available, each with a
recommended dose of 5 mg/day. Bhasin et al. recently showed
a beneficial effect of transdermal testosterone administration
(5 mg/day) to significantly increase lean body mass by 1.4
kg over 3 months in hypogonadal men with HIV infection. Potential
advantages of transdermal dosing include more stable, steady
state testosterone levels. However, further studies are necessary
to insure that mean testosterone levels are sufficient in
response to transdermal dosing. At the current time, either
transdermal or IM therapy is recommended for hypogonadal men
with HIV-infection. However, it is recommended that serum
testosterone levels be checked at least once after initiation
of transdermal therapy to insure adequate levels within the
normal range.
A commonly asked question regarding
testosterone administration in HIV-infected men is the appropriate
duration of therapy. A sustained anabolic effect of testosterone
administration on lean body mass of 3.7 kg or 7.6% over 12
months was previously demonstrated. No adverse effects on
the prostate or PSA were seen and hematocrit increased 3.5%
over this time period. These data suggest that continuation
of testosterone for at least one year is beneficial and results
in sustained increases in lean body mass. Serial monitoring
of the prostate is important with long-term testosterone administration.
Among patients who have achieved stable weight and are less
ill, discontinuation of testosterone and reassessment of gonadal
function is appropriate, as androgen levels may improve with
nutritional and immunologic recovery.
An important question is the
efficacy of androgen therapy in eugonadal men with the wasting
syndrome. At the current time, such supraphysiologic dosing
cannot be endorsed because of the potential risks related
to prostate, mood and acne. However, studies performed under
carefully controlled conditions and with appropriate monitoring
are now underway to determine the efficacy of larger dose
of testosterone in HIV-infected patients. A final question
concerns the role of exercise therapy, in combination with
anabolic therapy, to increase functional status in HIV-infected
men. Data in non HIV-infected men suggest an additive effect
of combined androgen and exercise therapy, but combined anabolic
strategies have not been previously studied among men with
AIDS wasting.
In summary, recent data suggest
that hypogonadism remains an important clinical problem among
HIV-infected men, even in the setting of potent antiviral
agents. Hypogonadism in HIV-infected men is most often associated
with low or inappropriately normal gonadotropin levels but
is not often associated with a sellar mass lesion. Recent
studies suggest a potent and sustained benefit of androgen
therapy to reverse significant underlying muscle loss in hypogonadal
HIV-infected men. At the current time, HIV infected patients
with evidence of weight loss or muscle weakness and/or clinical
symptoms of hypogonadism should be screened and treated for
hypogonadism. The use of testosterone to increase lean body
mass in eugonadal patients, must be considered experimental
until further data are obtained.
Figure Legend: Mean changeńSEM
for fat-free mass assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry,
lean body mass determined from potassium-40 isotope analysis,
and muscle mass from urinary creatinine excretion in patients
who received testosterone (left) and placebo (right) over
6 months. * P<0.05 and **P<0.01 for the change from baseline
between the testosterone group and the placebo group by analysis
of covariance. n="number" of patients for whom paired end
of study data are available. Reprinted from Reference 5 (below)
with permission of the American College of Physicians.
References:
1. Bhasin S, Storer TW, Asbel-Sethi
N, et al. 1998 Effects of testosterone replacement with a
nongenital, transdermal system, Androderm, in human immunodeficiency-virus
infected men with low testosterone levels. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 83:3155-3162.
2. Dobs AS, Dempsey MA, Ladenson PW, and Polk BF. 1988 Endocrine
disorders in men infected with human immunodeficiency virus.
Am J Med. 84:611-6.
3. Grinspoon SK and Bilezikian JB. 1992 HIV disease and the
endocrine system. N Engl J Med. 327:1360-1365.
4. Grinspoon S, Corcoran C, Lee K, et al. 1996 Loss of lean
body mass and muscle mass correlates with androgen levels
in hypogonadal men with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
and wasting. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:4051-4058.
5. Grinspoon S, Corcoran C, Askari H, et al. 1998 Effects
of androgen administration in men with aids wasting: a randomized,
placebo-controlled, trial. Ann Int Med. 129:18-26.
6. Grinspoon S, Corcoran C, Anderson E, Hubbard J, Basgoz
N, and Klibanski A. 1998 Sustained anabolic effects of long-term
androgen administration in men with AIDS wasting. Clin Inf
Dis. In press.
Neuroendocrine
& Pituitary Center |
Referrals
Neuroendocrine
Bulletin Archive | Guestbook
| Neurosurgery
Home | Links